Rosie B. Luistro ("Inevitable population decline: What to do about it," 11/30/22) errs on several points.
1. As one of the most densely populated countries on earth (388 per square kilometer, ranking 36th, just behind Israel), the Philippines should benefit by slightly lessening its density—unless the majority of people vote for more traffic, more pollution, more CO2 emissions, more crowding, and less adequate infrastructure.
2. Economic stagnation is not the result of a declining population. The "Asian giants" who turned themselves from poverty to affluence in the 20th century achieved it partly by lowering their fertility rates. Families with two children have more capital than families with four. A greater proportion of young people can be educated. Land per farmer can remain stable rather than shrink. And so on.
3. Below-replacement-level fertility will not result in the "extinction" of a nation but only a flattening and slight, temporary decline in its population curve.
4. To argue that "education for women" is a problem because it lowers the fertility rate—ask Filipino women if they would like to give up their education and careers.
High and growing global population, multiplied by high consumption by the affluent, cause not only crowding and noise in many places but a shortage of land, tensions, and violence arising from competition for land, water, fossil fuels, and minerals. Add immigration conflicts and many aspects of poverty: climate change, pollution ranging from plastics to poisons, habitat loss, and overexploitation of wildlife on land and sea.
The more quickly we transition to modest levels of population and consumption—possibly a lower population in 2100 than now, and far less consumption per capita among affluent nations such as the United States, the better our world will be for us and for the generations who follow.
New York, USA
- Lockdown or a drip feed of Covid restrictions? One path is better for the economy
- Coronavirus | Immunity for lesser time, change in ‘virulence’ of virus, say experts on September sero-survey results
- Scientists Suggest Using Graphene Heatpipes for 3.5x Better Performance
- Huge population of “Ultra-Dark Galaxies” discovered
- Average risk of breast cancer in women with the faulty 'Angelina Jolie' BRCA gene is just 35 per cent - much lower than 87 per cent like the actress and other carriers were told
- Science-Backed, Better Alternatives Can Improve Public Health
- Louisiana sees rise in savings, further drop in prison population from 2nd year of justice reforms
- Australia's Great Barrier Reef status lowered to "critical" and deteriorating
- Britain’s Covid death toll tops 60,000 with 414 new victims – but fatalities are 17% lower than last week and cases continue to fall with just 14,879 infections
- ‘Amazing evolutionary response’: Tasmanian devil gains edge in battle with devastating facial cancer
- UN: COVID-19 to worsen poverty in 47 poorest nations
- The best Xbox One X games
- Rural America may lack access to vaccines: media
- Amazon's new Kindle Fire HD, Paperwhite e-reader, and 2012 Kindle lineup: the full story
- Why the Right’s Principled Populists Will Lose
- Sen. Jack Reed on push for answers on reported Russian bounties for American troops
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: The Pricing Conundrum
- VIETNAM NEWS NOVEMBER 30
- The best water filter pitcher for 2020
- Austin Baldwin & Jasmin Tiro: Convincing people to get COVID vaccine is vital — here’s how to do it
Lower population, lesser density better for PH have 526 words, post on opinion.inquirer.net at December 6, 2022. This is cached page on Travel News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.